Bring Voter-Owned Elections
to your town
 

Part 2: Voter-Owned Elections Program Design Decisions

MAJOR ITEMS

Which offices included? (mayor, council, other?)

Qualification requirements for candidates, to demonstrate viability
• Signatures required to qualify for public VOE funds (800 - 1,000 sigs, or ...)
• $ amount for qualifying contributions (along with signatures) ($5, $10, other?)
• Starting & ending dates for qualifying period (dates after previous election...)

How much money?—$ amounts of base allocations
Council candidates
•$ for primary ($80,000, or ...)
•$ for general ($100,000, or ...)
Mayoral candidates
• $ for primary ($100,000, or ...)
• $ for general ($120,000, or ...)
$ Amounts if no primary opponent (qualifying $ only? .. or minimal $ amt)

In-kind contribution allowances, rules .. (percentage of base allotment, e.g. 10%, or ...)

How much money?— Matching (fair fight) funds
• maximum match rate (i.e. overall cap, expressed as multiple of base allotments) .. (e.g. 3x base)
• proportion of matching funds divvied among candidates if more than one (in primary) *see “Calculations”
• triggers for match $: opponent spending; independent electioneering expenditures
• reporting requirements (for privately-funded candidates, and 527-type IE spending)
Permitted funds during qualifying period - Seed $ allowances
• During qualifying period (specify dates of qualifying period)
• Maximum from candidate and immediate family .. ($1,000, or ...)
• Maximum size of contribution from donors ($100 per, or ...)
• Maximum seed $ allowed overall (% of base allotment, e.g. 10%, or...)

Administrative oversight agency
• Official administering agency (Seattle Ethics & Elections Commission, or ...)
• Procedures for rule making (same)
• Funding amount (overhead) (10% of VOE program costs, or ...)

Disclosure and reporting requirements
Non-cash candidate exposure—e.g. cable TV debates, voter pamphlets, website voter info.

Source / method of financing
•General fund?
•General fund, via “overhead charge” to each city department budget?
•Voluntary contributions .. if so, how generated?

MANY LESSER DETAILS
  • Overall program cost cap
    (no more than $5 per city resident, or set % of city budget, or...)
  • Uncontested primary? ($ amt allowed public funds?)
  • Permitted expenses for public campaign funds (limitations, restrictions on use of public funds)
  • Procedures and rules for withdrawal from program; penalties for late withdrawal
    Reporting requirements for non-participating candidates
  • Allowance for in-kind contributions to campaigns (e.g. 10 % of campaign allotment?
  • Communication with voters - debates, voter pamphlets (requirements ...)

* CALCULATIONS (options) on matching funds rate, in primary

This is only a suggestion, in how to divvy up matching funds among participating primary candidates, if there is more than one.

Consideration / objective: Provide sufficient matching funds, so that candidates can get their message out, and respond to higher spending by privately-funded opponents, while maintaining some reasonable limitations on public funds outlay.

In this scenario below, qualifying candidates would receive matching funds in proportion lesser than 1:1 (matching excess private spending or IE's), if there are more qualifying candidates to "answer" the spending by privately-funded opponents.

P$ = Base primary allotment amount for participating candidates
Overall Match = total available matching funds, to be divvied up among participating candidates
n = number of primary candidates qualifying for public funds

Overall match $ = P$ x (1+ (n-1)/2)

This formula works out as follows:

N
1
2
3
4
5

Etc.
if total triggered Match is
100
150
200
250
300


% of total match, to each candidate
100% - $100
 75% -  $ 75
 67% -  $ 67
 62% -  $ 62
 60% -  $ 6
0

VOTER-OWNED ELECTIONS DESIGN DECISIONS
Above page text in PDF format (Right-click, "save as" to your folder)

Home     Contact Us   Join     Donate   Privacy   Site Map
For any website problems or comments, please contact webmaster@washclean.org